URGENT REQUEST SEE 3 LETTERS
FRANCOIS HUGO Seal Alert SA
Letter 5 July to travel agencies NL
Sent:
Thursday, July
05, 2007 12:45 AM
Subject:
Degradation of
Sustainable Tourism around The Cape
To the managers of the travel agencies:
ANVR, TUI, Koning Aap, Elmar Reizen, Kristof Holidays, Globe
Reisburo, Explore Namibia
Ladies and gentlemen,
For some years we cooperate with François Hugo from Seal Alert
S.A. in South Africa to protect the Cape Fur Seals from extinction.
François Hugo is not only unique in his offshore methods of
treatment and care for rescued seals, but also the best advocate
for this threatened species.
On 1 July 2007 the annual massacre on Cape Fur Seals started
on the beach of the private property of the "De Beers" diamond
industry in Namibia. This massacre is executed on an already
dwindling colony of sick and undernourished protected
animals. On the night of 4 July we have been informed
that already more than 3000 seal babies have been killed. At the
moment the Namibian massacre is the biggest threat for this
species.
Many well-founded protests and - following other countries - a
Dutch notification of an import ban on Cape Fur Seal products,
could not withhold Namibian authorities to destroy unique protected
animals in your beautiful travel destination.
Although your agency might be informed on the situation, it is
interesting for your clients to know that for years South Africa
and Namibia have made life impossible for the Cape Fur Seals. They
have been exiled from the Cape Islands, their natural habitat. In
fact Robben Island has been robbed from its name significance by
government interference.
Although seals have no culinary interest in birds whatsoever, this
government policy has been executed to protect the birds. The real
reason is the protection of the fishing industry interests.
The seals have to survive on the beach or the low rocks at the
waterline before the beaches around The Cape. On the beach they
fall prey to land predators and men. For seals these are
totally unnatural enemies for which they have no ability to defend
or immunity to their diseases. The low rocks do not give adequate
protection either as new generations of seal babies are wiped out
by the high seas in winter storms.
In fact we witness an intentional genocide on the seals. Not
only by the exile from their habitat but also by fishermen shooting
off seals at sea for the fun of it and by the systematic culling of
suckling seal babies and adult animals, the so called "harvesting
of the young growth in a healthy population".
The mere word "harvesting" reflects the moral indifference towards
culling. The fixed quota of the harvest is higher than the present
healthy animals. It will be silent on the beach and the left
carcasses are always a stinking problem. The responsible Namibian
minister offered a solution by encouraging his people to start
eating seal meat, but they don't have the appetite for it. An
otherwise useful suggestion for removing the carcasses as people
can eat something else whilst seals cannot. They are totally
dependent on fish and consequently are more entitled to that
diet than people.
Besides disdain for and destruction of their natural environment we
also notice a remarkable denial and untruthfulness regarding
this systematic massacre:
De Beers assumes an injured innocence but permits the killing on
her private beaches that are not accessible to strangers.
Authorities falsify data on the numbers and health of the seal
population. Rescue and feeding of seals is a penal offence. The
South African minister who started this policy underlined his
destructive disposition by lobbying in The Netherlands for a
massive elephant cull.
Extensive Dutch background information Nederlandse
achtergrondinformatie on the history and actual situation can
be found under this link.
Complementary English information is found in the
website of Action Against
Poisoning.
In our view South African and Namibian authorities are executing an
intentional destructive nature and environmental policy, despite
all protests against the destruction of the seals and requests for
example for the return of the seals to their habitat. The
destruction of a species and its habitat will - not alone by the
deeds but also by the underlying mentality - have its repercussions
on the for these countries extremely important tourist branche. If
a government looses track on its own touristic interests, only the
concerned travel agencies can turn the tide.
We understand that a growing number of travel agencies includes
"sustainable tourism" in their policies bearing in mind the demand
for sustainable tourism and the decay by negligence of some travel
destinalions of great value.
On behalf of Seal Alert S.A. and other animal protection
organisations we call on you to warn Namibia - and regarding among
others Robben Island South Africa as well - that their contempt of
nature in general and the Cape Fur Seals in particular warrants a
boycott of these countries as travel destinations.
We look forward to your reaction.
With kind regards,
Action Against Poisoning
info@actionagainstpoisoning.com
For the seals
PLEASE WRITE
Fax
to 0026461233286 - 0026461224566
PRESS RELEASE June 26,
2007
Public
Call For Namibia To Announce A Moratorium on Seal Culling
Policy
PLEASE
WRITE TO:
To:
secretary@namibia.org.za
Cc:
namibia@un.int ;
lmupetami@mweb.com.na ;
aiyambo@mfmr.gov.na ;
ambanga@mfmr.gov.na
Dear
Mrs Gray or Mrs Vanhees for attention his Excellency the High
Commissioner Wilbard Hellao,
Attached
letter by Francois
Hugo
Letter sent by Action
Against Poisoning 28 june 2007
faxed to :
the Namibian Ministry,
Attention Permanent Secretary Nongula Mbako
on + 264 61 233 286 and + 264 61 224 566
Action
Against Poisoning fights animal poisoning in particular and
supports animal protection efforts in general. We have been
informed on the impending seal cull in Namibia, starting on July 1,
2007.
Like us, the
Namibian authorities have repeatedly and extensively been informed
by Seal Alert S.A. on facts regarding the seal population in that
region, so we will not repeat their fact-based arguments. The facts
about the ill health and dwindling population of the seals and
sealing rights are clear and the arguments against culling are
solid.
Given the actual
facts and arguments we are saddened by the stubborn Namibian policy
to continue the seal culling – against international public opinion
- under the pretext that a massive culling will not harm the seal
population in Namibia. A pretext based on fabricated evidence as we
cannot find any match with the facts.
This
policy reflects a rock bottom respect for animal life and
international animal protection legislation.
We cannot fathom why
the responsible authorities choose to create an image of a
destructive and arbitrary administration earning a few dollars on
seal genocide. A choice that is extremely harmful to the image of
Namibia as a successful emerging tourist
destination.
If Namibia executes
its culling plan we will not hesitate to mobilize our vast network
of animal protection organizations and travel agencies by exposing
this destructive behavior.
We
call on you to stop the intended Namibian seal culling before it
starts on July 1, 2007.
SHOW YOU CARE FOR THE CAPE FUR SEALS, WEAR THIS
T-SHIRT
PETITION FOR THE CAPE FUR SEALS
NAMIBIA
Letter sent by AAP via
www.harpseals.org/helpstop/protest_new/namibia_email.php
Dear
Sir,
Action Against
Poisoning fights animal poisoning in particular and supports animal
protection in general.
We have been informed on the culling of baby Cape Fur seals in
Namibia. We cannot fathom the pleasure that people derive from such
activities as no money can compensate the act of a massacre, be it
on men or on animals.
We were already
quite upset by the visit - a few months ago - of the South African
Minister Martinus Van Schalkwijk to his embassy in The Netherlands
to lobby for elephant culling as a new project added to his
successful Cape Fur Seal culling policy. What species might he want
to cull next? This man loves culling!
Now we are confonted with a Namibian Minister telling his people to
get used to eating seal meat as a means of disposing of the seal
pup carcasses, obviously making the killing "useful" for the
Namibian people.
We hope that you
will understand that this contageous, unscrupulous and destructive
attitude is repulsive to people who value life. Why are even
educated African officials so gung-ho on massive killing of
helpless animals that they are willing to forfeit all international
support and respect for their actions and - consequently - their
country?
As your
motivation eludes us, please explain your
emotional and financial considerations and decisions that lead to
the deliberate annihilation of the Namibian seals.
If we can understand, we might not loose all faith in the
government of one of the most precious nature regions of the
world.
We look forward to your reply.
Yours
sincerely,
Drs P.M.
Donker
Action Against Poisoning
www.actionagainstpoisoning.com




