URGENT REQUEST SEE 3 LETTERS
FRANCOIS HUGO Seal Alert SA
Letter 5 July to travel agencies NL
Sent:
Thursday,
July 05, 2007 12:45 AM
Subject:
Degradation
of Sustainable Tourism around The Cape
To the managers of the travel agencies:
ANVR, TUI, Koning Aap, Elmar Reizen, Kristof Holidays,
Globe Reisburo, Explore Namibia
Ladies and gentlemen,
For some years we cooperate with François Hugo from
Seal Alert S.A. in South Africa to protect the Cape Fur
Seals from extinction. François Hugo is not only unique in
his offshore methods of treatment and care for rescued
seals, but also the best advocate for this threatened
species.
On 1 July 2007 the annual massacre on Cape Fur Seals
started on the beach of the private property of
the "De Beers" diamond industry in Namibia. This
massacre is executed on an already dwindling colony of sick
and undernourished protected animals. On the night
of 4 July we have been informed that already more than
3000 seal babies have been killed. At the moment the
Namibian massacre is the biggest threat for this species.
Many well-founded protests and - following other countries
- a Dutch notification of an import ban on Cape Fur Seal
products, could not withhold Namibian authorities to
destroy unique protected animals in your beautiful travel
destination.
Although your agency might be informed on the situation, it
is interesting for your clients to know that for years
South Africa and Namibia have made life impossible for the
Cape Fur Seals. They have been exiled from the Cape
Islands, their natural habitat. In fact Robben Island has
been robbed from its name significance by government
interference.
Although seals have no culinary interest in birds
whatsoever, this government policy has been executed to
protect the birds. The real reason is the protection of the
fishing industry interests.
The seals have to survive on the beach or the low rocks at
the waterline before the beaches around The Cape. On the
beach they fall prey to land predators and men. For
seals these are totally unnatural enemies for which they
have no ability to defend or immunity to their diseases.
The low rocks do not give adequate protection either as new
generations of seal babies are wiped out by the high seas
in winter storms.
In fact we witness an intentional genocide on the
seals. Not only by the exile from their habitat but also by
fishermen shooting off seals at sea for the fun of it and
by the systematic culling of suckling seal babies and adult
animals, the so called "harvesting of the young growth in a
healthy population".
The mere word "harvesting" reflects the moral indifference
towards culling. The fixed quota of the harvest is higher
than the present healthy animals. It will be silent on the
beach and the left carcasses are always a stinking problem.
The responsible Namibian minister offered a solution by
encouraging his people to start eating seal meat, but they
don't have the appetite for it. An otherwise useful
suggestion for removing the carcasses as people can eat
something else whilst seals cannot. They are totally
dependent on fish and consequently are more entitled
to that diet than people.
Besides disdain for and destruction of their natural
environment we also notice a remarkable denial and
untruthfulness regarding this systematic massacre:
De Beers assumes an injured innocence but permits the
killing on her private beaches that are not accessible to
strangers. Authorities falsify data on the numbers and
health of the seal population. Rescue and feeding of seals
is a penal offence. The South African minister who started
this policy underlined his destructive disposition by
lobbying in The Netherlands for a massive elephant cull.
Extensive Dutch background information Nederlandse
achtergrondinformatie on the history and actual
situation can be found under this link.
Complementary English information is found
in the website of Action
Against Poisoning.
In our view South African and Namibian authorities are
executing an intentional destructive nature and
environmental policy, despite all protests against the
destruction of the seals and requests for example for the
return of the seals to their habitat. The destruction of a
species and its habitat will - not alone by the deeds but
also by the underlying mentality - have its repercussions
on the for these countries extremely important tourist
branche. If a government looses track on its own touristic
interests, only the concerned travel agencies can turn the
tide.
We understand that a growing number of travel agencies
includes "sustainable tourism" in their policies bearing in
mind the demand for sustainable tourism and the decay by
negligence of some travel destinalions of great value.
On behalf of Seal Alert S.A. and other animal protection
organisations we call on you to warn Namibia - and
regarding among others Robben Island South Africa as well -
that their contempt of nature in general and the Cape Fur
Seals in particular warrants a boycott of these countries
as travel destinations.
We look forward to your reaction.
With kind regards,
Action Against Poisoning
info@actionagainstpoisoning.com
For the seals
PLEASE WRITE
Fax
to 0026461233286 - 0026461224566
PRESS RELEASE June 26,
2007
Public
Call For Namibia To Announce A Moratorium on Seal Culling
Policy
PLEASE
WRITE TO:
To:
secretary@namibia.org.za
Cc:
namibia@un.int
;
lmupetami@mweb.com.na
;
aiyambo@mfmr.gov.na
;
ambanga@mfmr.gov.na
Dear
Mrs Gray or Mrs Vanhees for attention his Excellency the
High Commissioner Wilbard Hellao,
Attached
letter by Francois
Hugo
Letter sent
by Action Against Poisoning 28 june 2007
faxed to :
the Namibian Ministry,
Attention Permanent Secretary Nongula Mbako
on + 264 61 233 286 and + 264 61 224 566
Action Against Poisoning fights
animal poisoning in particular and supports animal
protection efforts in general. We have been informed on the
impending seal cull in Namibia, starting on July 1,
2007.
Like us, the
Namibian authorities have repeatedly and extensively been
informed by Seal Alert S.A. on facts regarding the seal
population in that region, so we will not repeat their
fact-based arguments. The facts about the ill health and
dwindling population of the seals and sealing rights are
clear and the arguments against culling are
solid.
Given the
actual facts and arguments we are saddened by the stubborn
Namibian policy to continue the seal culling – against
international public opinion - under the pretext that a
massive culling will not harm the seal population in
Namibia. A pretext based on fabricated evidence as we
cannot find any match with the facts.
This
policy reflects a rock bottom respect for animal life and
international animal protection
legislation.
We cannot
fathom why the responsible authorities choose to create an
image of a destructive and arbitrary administration earning
a few dollars on seal genocide. A choice that is extremely
harmful to the image of Namibia as a successful emerging
tourist destination.
If Namibia
executes its culling plan we will not hesitate to mobilize
our vast network of animal protection organizations and
travel agencies by exposing this destructive
behavior.
We
call on you to stop the intended Namibian seal culling
before it starts on July 1, 2007.
SHOW YOU CARE FOR THE CAPE FUR SEALS, WEAR THIS
T-SHIRT
PETITION FOR THE CAPE FUR SEALS
NAMIBIA
Letter sent by AAP via
www.harpseals.org/helpstop/protest_new/namibia_email.php
Dear
Sir,
Action
Against Poisoning fights animal poisoning in particular and
supports animal protection in general.
We have been informed on the culling of baby Cape Fur seals
in Namibia. We cannot fathom the pleasure that people
derive from such activities as no money can compensate the
act of a massacre, be it on men or on animals.
We were
already quite upset by the visit - a few months ago - of
the South African Minister Martinus Van Schalkwijk to his
embassy in The Netherlands to lobby for elephant culling as
a new project added to his successful Cape Fur Seal culling
policy. What species might he want to cull next? This man
loves culling!
Now we are confonted with a Namibian Minister telling his
people to get used to eating seal meat as a means of
disposing of the seal pup carcasses, obviously making the
killing "useful" for the Namibian people.
We hope
that you will understand that this contageous, unscrupulous
and destructive attitude is repulsive to people who value
life. Why are even educated African officials so gung-ho on
massive killing of helpless animals that they are willing
to forfeit all international support and respect for their
actions and - consequently - their country?
As your
motivation eludes us, please explain
your emotional and financial
considerations and decisions that lead to the deliberate
annihilation of the Namibian seals.
If we can understand, we might not loose all faith in the
government of one of the most precious nature regions of
the world.
We look forward to your reply.
Yours
sincerely,
Drs P.M.
Donker
Action Against Poisoning
www.actionagainstpoisoning.com