How you feel as false scientists?
BRAVO SLAVUJ! BRAVO MY HEROIC FIGHTER!
Maria,
Brussels
*
. * . *
FROM:
epar
SENT:
Saturday 17 May
2008
TO:
ScientificAffairs@OD.NIH.GOV
SUBJECT:
How
you feel as false scientists?
Madam Margaret
Snyder ;
Let me say
You that everything about smoking harms and harts is very
well known.
There
is here today no one question without answer - as You know
too.
There
is no one unknown fact today - but you do so-called
"experiments" .
All your
experiments on poor animals here ,are so unnecessary
because You have people smokers, You can make
prospective study on humans smokers - that would be useful, instead
these stupid things what you do : cruel animals
who never can be smoker and who have different: metabolisms ,
morphology, physiology , genoms etc, and all these
dollars spending- for your salaries too, is unnecessary
and nonsense too, and Your explanation here
is very nonsense too.
And
what you do to these poor animals
IS really crime , madam Snyder ,
I am very sorry, but Yor wrote very insufficient,poor explanation
-because really reason for experiments on animals
as smokers , here doesn`t egzist - if I want
be sincere, there is Your nonsense explanation here
below, and You, I am sure have very high salary
for all these nonsenses what You and
Your coworkers do and what You here below
wrote.
It
could be more useful if You work something else- for example
You and Your coworkers , you all can make very good
cakes for your children at home, honored madame.
And
you all , who work in this ,are not scietists, but
greed , pitiless criminals - and
you all know this fact- but you just
need reason for use big money of smoking industry
and that is whatfor you do these experiments
.
Excuse
me that is fact- and You and your coworkers( if it is
everything ok with your personal IQ ) very well know
this fact.
How
you feel as false scientists ? Are You ashamed when You are
alone in front of the mirror ? Can You say the truth to Yourself
.
We
know its. You know its too.
Note: English
is not my mother language .
Sincerely
MD Slavica Mazak
Beslic
EPAR/OIPA/Alliance
for Animal Rights/SAV
www.epar.org.yu
serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/
Dear Ms.
Petitjean:
Thank
you for your letter to the National Institutes of Health
(NIH). I am responding to your concerns regarding the funding
of research on the effects of nicotine in nonhuman
animals.
As
the Nation's principal health research agency, the NIH must
continue to support quality research that provides new information
on the consequences of and treatments for a variety of harmful
addictive behaviors, including the use of tobacco. NIH
supports research on the biologic effects of nicotine with an
expectation of the development of better ways of helping people
eliminate or reduce their dependence on tobacco- and to achieve
further progress in reducing the heavy burden of diseases linked to
smoking.
Millions
of dollars are spent by voluntary health organizations and federal
agencies on both smoking prevention and cessation campaigns.
A federal mandate exists for the labeling of cigarettes. Many
people have given up the habit; yet it remains a major health
concern in the Western world.
It
is estimated between 10 and 17 percent of pregnant women still
smoke. We must look for ways to help those who cannot help
themselves, including the thousands of unborn children that suffer
from the adverse effects of maternal smoking. A woman’s risk
of having a low-birth weight or a premature baby is significantly
increased by smoking. In addition to health problems as a
newborn, these babies face increased risks of serious chronic
lifelong disabilities (such as cerebral palsy, mental retardation
and learning problems). Maternal smoking has been estimated
to cause 10 percent of infant and fetal mortality, including an
increased incidence in sudden infant death syndrome
(SIDS).
Scientists
care about animals and only use them when no other methods are
available to assess biological responses. They operate on the
basic premise that the use of living animals in properly designed
and humanely conducted studies is both ethical and
appropriate. Moreover, the current studies on nicotine are
expected to provide new insights into the effects of chronic
exposure to these substances. The medical community still
needs answers to many questions in order to develop effective
methods for preventing or modifying the illnesses resulting from
smoking both for smokers and non-smokers.
In
accord with Federal law, all of the projects submitted to the NIH
for funding were evaluated by two panels. The first panel or
scientific review group, consisting of 16-20 non-Federal scientists
chosen for their expertise in particular scientific areas, judged
these studies to be scientifically meritorious. The outcomes
of these reviews were brought to a second panel or
National
Advisory
Council composed of 12-18 scientists, health care practitioners,
and lay persons concerned with public health. This group
considered the studies to be relevant and important to the missions
of several NIH awarding components. We are confident that
this rigorous review process ensures that the NIH supports only
meritorious research projects and minimizes any unnecessary
duplication of research activities.
Thank
you for the opportunity to respond to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Margaret Snyder,
Ph.D.