Companies and sponsors do not want to be commercially and promotionally associated with bullfighting in Portugal: in less than two months, seven companies have stepped away from the bullfighting events they were somehow involved with | Several of these companies have condemned animal cruelty on their statements regarding their decision of ending their involvement with bullfighting
 
Since the end of April until yesterday – in less than two months –, following protest and boycott initiatives organised by the Portuguese animal protection organisation ANIMAL, participated and supported by its partner organisations in Holland, the UK, France, Spain and from other countries, as much as by hundreds of individuals from Portugal and from many other countries, seven national and international companies which had some kind of commercial involvement with, or provided some sort of support to, bullfighting initiatives in Portugal have stepped away from these events with which they were at some point associated.
 
Some of these companies have gone farther and have condemned cruelty against animals when stating their decision of ending their relationship with the bullfighting initiative that they were associated to.
 
1.       On April 23rd, less than 24 hours before the protests started, the international ice cream chain Ben & Jerry’s – which was being announced as the sponsor of the Lisbon Students Association Bullfight – has stated, through their office in the UK, that this sponsorship had been terminated. According to the company, its Portuguese branch was sponsoring the Lisbon Students Association festivities and was unaware of the fact that a bullfight was included in the programme. Upon being informed about this situation and being urged to clarify its position, Ben & Jerry’s ordered the promoters of the bullfight to remove any reference to the name and brand of the company from its signs and general publicity, as the company did not want to be associated with the bullfight in any way.
 
2.       On the same day, the promoters of the bullfight organised by college students presented Caixa Geral de Depósitos (CGD), the biggest bank in Portugal (state-owned), as the next sponsor of that brutal event. Again, following protests generate by ANIMAL, on the afternoon of the 23rd April, a public relations officer of the bank contacted ANIMAL to explain that the bank was, in fact, sponsoring the students´ general festivities (which included mostly music concerts and other cruelty-free events) but had specified that it wanted to have no association with the bullfight. This sadistic spectacle did take place on the 30th April, sadly, but without any sponsor left.
 
3.       On 8th May, UNICER (partially holded by the CARLSBERG group) responded to the many requests it had received about a bullfight that was being announced for 10th May and of which UNICER was a sponsor, via its popular beer brand, “Super Bock”. On the statement issued by the company regarding this matter, a senior communication officer of UNICER said, “the association of our brand with this bullfight was an operational mistake” and “UNICER will now withdraw all the advertising materials associating our brand to this event”. The statement by UNICER went happily beyond a simple dissociation of the company regarding this particular bullfight when it stated that “UNICER and its brands respects animal rights and their interests” and “the association of our brands with events of this sort is not part of our communication strategy. We also confirm that it is not part of our plan to change this position in the future”. Again, the shameful bullfight took place, but without sponsors, so it was not a profitable event.
 
4.       After having been targeted by national and international protests for being presented as “Supporter” of a pro-bullfighting weekly TV programme in Portugal, international group KODAK not only removed its association from the programme but it also made a much stronger statement. On 26th May, KODAK UK Chairman, Julian Baust, wrote, in a letter to the League Against Cruel Sports, “KODAK in no way condones cruelty to animals. Upon being made aware of this situation, KODAK requested that the association of the KODAK brand with the programme cease”, informing the League that KODAK had already instructed its Portuguese distributor to cease the association of the brand with the above mentioned TV programme before receiving the League’s letter.
 
5.       28th May – two days after KODAK stated its distance from bullfighting and animal cruelty, international hotel chain Marriott International responded to the many messages that the group was receiving about a “bullfighting tourism package” that one of its hotels in Portugal was offering to its clients, thus promoting the “bullfighting tourism” on the Portuguese town where this hotel was located, Caldas da Rainha. Responding to the protests, the Marriott International Sales & Marketing Vice-President for Continental Europe informed the concerned consumers who had sent messages to the group that the “bullfighting package” was no longer available and had been terminated.
 
6.       On 12th May, a Portuguese nationwide tabloid, “24 Horas”, was no longer announced as one of the supporters of a bullfight that was to take place at Lisbon’s Bullring on May 15th. Despite the fact that this tabloid had sponsored the bullfights that had previously took place at that bullring and despite the fact that it has again become involved as a supporter of other bullfights (and is actually organising its own bullfight, to take place in early July), “24 Horas” has indeed bounced and stepped back once, ending its association with that particular bullfight, contrarily to what was announced before.
 
7.       Yesterday, 17th June, it was Melka’s turn. This Swedish clothing brand was announced as supporter of the pro-bullfighting TV programme that KODAK had dissociated from. Following the protests sent to Melka, the company´s Iberian Regional Manager sent a message to ANIMAL saying that “Melka did not have or has any intention of associating its name to any cruel event and especially not if it involves cruelty to animals” and stating that “the people who head our brand are humane and sensitive”. This company manager also said that he was “on the other side”, where “there are also people who share the same animal protection concerns that move you, which is my case”, and he specified that the company wanted to “take this opportunity […] to present our apologies about this matter and about its eventually offensive aspect” and that they had already “given specific instructions to the presenter of the programme to withdraw any identification of the brand from this programme”. The programme was left without sponsors.
 
Other companies are currently being targeted with equal protests and calls to end their association with bullfighting in Portugal.
 
Rita Silva, Vice-President of ANIMAL, said, “the message that we are sending to these and to all the companies, actually, is that to support the torture of animals in bullfights is not only ethically unacceptable, it is also a disastrous option, in terms of advertising, promotional and commercial effects. All around the world and certainly in Portugal, consumers are becoming more aware, informed, concerned and active. They will boycott a product, brand or company when they engage in conducts which disrespect human rights, animal rights or the conservation of nature – but they will also be especially interested in giving preference to products, services, brands and companies that are ethically, humanely, socially and ecologically responsible, as a way of rewarding their good practices. This means that companies which have walked away from bullfighting or which are not at all involved with this barbaric and bloody activity are favourite companies to caring consumers , while companies which get involved with bullfighting and maintain that involvement will be boycotted as a way of protest against their wrongful ethical stance on this matter. Consumers hold an enormous power to change what is wrong and that is proving to be true in Portugal. ANIMAL can only feel happy and proud of helping to make this change happen”.
 
“Without all these sponsorships that the bullfighting industry has lost in Portugal and without other new sponsorships that this immoral industry will no longer be able to attract, based on the clear message that the last two months have sent, the existence of bullfighting in Portugal is even more strongly threatened. The end of the sadistic and dark brutalisation of animals in bullfights is coming to its end in Portugal”, said ANIMAL’s Vice-President.
 
 
Please make as generous a donation as you can TODAY to enable ANIMAL to continue and better its work to abolish bullfights in Portugal and to forward animal protection in this country:
 
·         Use PayPal to make a safe and easy internet payment– please go to www.PayPal.com/ and make a donation to info@animal.org.pt
 
·         Make a bank transfer to the following account:
ANIMAL – Associação Nortenha de Intervenção no Mundo AnimaL
Montepio Geral (Caixa Económica)
IBAN: PT50 0036 0093 9910 0034 4746 9
BIC/SWIFT: MPIOPTPL
 
·         Make a regular donation by cheque or money order and posting it to us at: ANIMAL, Apartado 24140, 1251-997 Lisboa, Portugal
 
 

Animal.org.pt :: No More Crimes Without Punishment :: ManifestoANIMAL.org
 
Please, do not keep this message only for yourself: please forward it to others who you think may also care about the plight of animals in Portugal and who may also want to help
 
If you want to start receiving ANIMAL´s e-Newsletters, please send a message saying “Subscribe” to miguel.moutinho@animal.org.pt